Motels
     Home    Newsletter    Contact
Motels
About Us
Property Search
Industry Information
Industry Assistance
Professional Assistance
Buying Assistance
Selling Your Business
Testimonials
Archive
Our Link Partners
Featured Properties
Motels
Vendor wants property sold – drastically reduced – will consider all offers!
Region:
NSW - South Coast
Type:
Leasehold
Motels
A MIX OF PERFECT PERMANENTS AND FREE INDEPENDENTS
Region:
Victoria - Gippsland
Type:
Freehold
Motels
A TOP BEACHFRONT MOTEL – RICH IN LAND
Region:
Victoria - Gippsland
Type:
Freehold
Motels
Rare boom town freehold – 18% return
Region:
QLD - Inland South
Type:
Freehold
Motels
Motels
  Motels
Peter Middlebrook
0421 904 675
NSW SPECIALIST
 
David Harris
0433 199 282
BRISBANE
 
Reg Partington
0407 412 479
VICTORIAN SPECIALIST
Sonya Clark
0433 336 090
SUNSHINE COAST
 
Craig Clark
0433 339 230
SUNSHINE COAST & NSW
 
Chris Rowe
0433 335 379
MACKAY & QLD NORTH
Sally Rowe
0433 335 679
MACKAY & QLD NORTH
 
Donna Philpott
C/ 02 9872 9943
CENTRALISED SUPPORT
 
Peter Gay
0433 091 920
NSW SOUTH - MURRAY
Michael Philpott
0433 137 927
NSW, QLD & VICTORIA
 
Keith Braithwaite
0430 462 370
BRISBANE, TOOWOOMBA & GOLD COAST
 
John Warren
0418 653 933
QLD (NOOSA NORTH)
David Head
0438 663 551
NEW SOUTH WALES
 
Office
02 9872 9943
Centralised Administration
02 9872 9943
   
NEWS
:: 23/12/2009 - NSW Strata maintenance

By Small Myers Hughes Lawyers

In the recent case of Seiwa Pty Ltd v Owners Strata Plan 35042 1157, the NSW Supreme Court gave a judgment which could be considered a wake up call for owners corporations in New South Wales.

Seiwa Australia Pty Ltd (Seiwa), the owner of a unit in this particular Strata Plan sued the owners corporation for damages and injunctive relief. Seiwa claimed that the owners corporation had failed to carry out its duty to maintain the common property and as a result of this failure, the owners corporation was said to be in breach of section 62 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 NSW.

Section 62(1) of the Act states that “an owners corporation must properly maintain and keep in a state of good and serviceable repair the common property and any personal property vested in the owners corporation”.

The defective common property in this case comprised of two aspects. The first complaint was the rusting of steelwork that formed the framework of the enclosed balcony of Seiwa’s unit. The second, was water penetration from the patio into the living area of the unit, as a result of a defect in the water proof membrane.

The owners corporation was alerted to both problems in March 2003 but did not remedy the rust problem until August 2005 and the leaking water proof membrane as at the date of the court case had still not been rectified.

The Court gave judgment in favour of Seiwa, asserting that section 62(1) of the Act imposed a strict duty on an owners corporation to maintain and keep in repair the common property. The Court said that any breach of this section is a breach of statutory duty and gives rise to a private cause of action under which damages may be awarded to a lot owner.

In defence, the owners corporation argued that it had taken all reasonable steps to perform its duty under section 62 and that Seiwa was guilty of contributory negligence. However, the Court held that both these issues were irrelevant because of the strict nature of the owners corporations’ duty under this section of the Act. The owners corporation had simply not maintained the common property and were therefore in breach of the section.

The owners corporation was ordered to pay the amount of $150,000.00 in damages to Seiwa for the loss of use of the unit, and depending on whether the owners corporation complied with a mandatory injunction that the balcony be rectified within 3 months, awarded a further $250,000.00 to Seiwa in respect of a reduction in value of the unit should the repairs not be completed in that time. The owners corporation also had to pay Seiwa’s legal costs.

As a result of this case, all owners’ corporations in NSW, including their building managers and committee members need to be responsible and proactive in their approach to maintaining all common property areas. Owner’s corporations owe a duty of care to each lot owner to maintain the common property and a failure to do so, as seen in this case, could hold serious ramifications.





 
Tourism Brokers Pty Ltd & Tourism Brokers(QLD)Pty Ltd give notice that:-

1. All information relating to the property and/or business conducted therein, whether given orally and/or in documents, including plans, agreements, income and expenses projected or actual, profit and loss, occupancy rates and the like is provided by the vendor. All intending purchasers are to make their own inquiries and assessments as to the accuracy or otherwise of the information supplied by the vendor.

2. It must be noted that Tourism Brokers Pty Ltd and its servants and agents have made no enquiries as to the accuracy of the information supplied by the vendor. No liability for the information will be accepted by Tourism Brokers Pty Ltd.

Disclaimer:
Purchasing a business can involve risk where there is a chance that the amount invested could be lost. Always consult a professional for advice before embarking on a business purchase. Tourism Brokers Pty Ltd is retained as the vendor’s agent.

The information we provide in good faith has been furnished to us by the Vendors in the majority of instances. We have not verified whether or not the information is accurate and do not have any belief one way of the other in its accuracy. We do not accept any responsibility to any person for its accuracy and do no more than pass it on. All interested parties should make their own inquiries in order to determine whether or not this information is in fact accurate.
 
 
Centralised Administration, 32 Lamorna Avenue, Beecroft NSW 2119
Copyright © Lionrock Consulting Pty Ltd. All rights reserved 2005.
Web Design powered by Dreeme